top of page
  • Writer's pictureSasha Borissenko

EPISODE 9: Magic bullets

As the government grapples with removing GST from fruit and vegetables but sidesteps any talk of a sugar tax, episode 9 explores why soft drinks are so cheap at your local supermarket.

Ever wondered why there’s an entire supermarket aisle dedicated to fizzy drinks for two-for-one prices and yet a head of cabbage costs $6.99?

Monopoly Watch NZ spokesman Tex Edwards told Chewing the Facts it’s because rebates are paid to people who sell certain brands.

Rebates can include large suppliers paying supermarkets to exclusively stock the supplier’s products or a portion of fridge or shelf space, he said.

“These financial payments camouflage the true price of what a bottle of Coke is or the incentives a retailer is given to sell it to you.”

For companies that have market power, rebates tend to be illegal in other countries, he said.

It means Coca Coca New Zealand is one of the company’s most profitable branches per capita, Edwards said.

As of May 2021, Coca Cola’s shares were worth US$230 billion, making it the second-largest international food and beverage corporation behind Nestle.

Coca Cola’s New Zealand arm made a gross profit of $380 million for the year ending December last year.

A 2021 study found the company dominated the global fizzy drinks market in 2020 at 47 per cent, with Pepsi coming in second at 19 per cent.

Coca Cola made up 57 per cent of the Australasian market. Coca Cola declined to comment.

The situation is exacerbated by New Zealand’s reluctance to introduce a sugar tax, Edwards said.

More than 50 countries have some sort of sugar tax. A World Health Organisation review in 2022 assessed 86 studies and found a sugar tax was linked to a fifteen per cent drop in sales and no negative effect on employment rates.

Last year the Commerce Commission released its draft for consultation on the Misuse of Market Power Guidelines. It found that rebates and discounts offered to retailers or distributors by a supplier with substantial market power could harm competition by reducing the ability of other suppliers to compete effectively.

Food and Grocery Council CEO Raewyn Bleakley said consumers decided to purchase certain products, which led to greater supply.

“In every market you have the 80-20 rule... generally [sic] applies where you have a smaller number of large companies because scale and having global reach has benefits. That’s business, that’s the world we live in.”

Suppliers provided the product to the supermarkets and “they certainly may entertain and negotiate different promotions and fund those, but it is ultimately the retailers that make those decisions”.

A Foodstuffs spokesperson said the cost of goods from suppliers was the largest cost to its business, making up 68 cents of every retail dollar on the shelf.

“Other factors include the cost of getting the product onto the shelf, whether the product is in good supply and if it’s on or off special.”

A Woolworths spokesperson said it had a range of commercial agreements, including rebate agreements that are negotiated with suppliers.

“We can’t share details as this is commercially sensitive to the suppliers we deal with.”

Finite shelf space required balancing product, shelf space, and storage availability.

In August commerce and consumer affairs minister Duncan Webb released the new Grocery Supply Code to even the level playing field between suppliers and supermarkets.

A Commerce Commission spokesperson said the code addressed rebates by ensuring terms of supply were clear and supermarkets couldn’t charge rebates unless written into agreements that were expressly agreed to by suppliers.

New rules around wholesaling meant grocery stores would have to reveal the scale and efficiency of their business, including volume rebates.

New Grocery Commissioner Pierre van Heerden can also take action if necessary.

Chewing the Facts - new episodes out every Sunday. Produced with the NZ Herald, with support from NZ On Air. Show notes and research are available via

You can follow the podcast at iHeartRadio, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.

This article originally appeared in the NZ Herald here.


- The role of sugar-sweetened beverages in the global epidemics of obesity and chronic diseases

- The caloric and sugar content of beverages purchased at different store-types changed after the sugary drinks taxation in Mexico

- Public Service Commission: Standards of Integrity and Conduct

- Supporting transparency in political lobbying

- How food companies use social media to influence policy debates: a framework of Australian ultra-processed food industry Twitter data

- Food prices and obesity: Evidence and policy implications for taxes and subsidies

- Framing obesity: the framing contest between industry and public health at the New Zealand inquiry into obesity

- World Health Organisation: Oral health

- Ultra-processed foods: A global threat to public health

- Lobbying influence: Meaning, measurement and missing

- Voices for health: going, going, going…

- New Zealand Parliament: Schools—Healthy Food National Administration Guideline

- Transparency International: Corruption perceptions index

- Bryce Edwards: Who will drain Wellington’s lobbying swamp?

- Canada: Lobbying Act

- Ministry of Justice: Political lobbyist code of conduct meetings

- The revolving door between government and the alcohol, food and gambling industries in Australia

- New Zealand Parliament: Lobbying regimes - an outline

- New Zealand Legislation: Lobbying Disclosure Bill

- OAG decision to not investigate Katherine Rich disappointing

- About the Auditor-General's work

- Katherine Rich stands firm against call to resign after allegations of conflict

- Sellman v Slater [2021] NZHC 762 (12 April 2021)

- Sellman v Slater [2021] NZHC 752 (9 April 2021)

- Sellman v Slater [2018] NZHC 3057 (23 November 2018)

- Sellman v Slater [2017] NZHC 2392; [2018] 2 NZLR 218 (2 October 2017)

- Which companies dominate the packaged food supply of New Zealand and how healthy are their products?

- Coca-Cola Europacific Partners Holdings NZ Limited (formerly known as Coca-Cola Holdings NZ Limited) Annual Report For the year ended 31 December 2022

- Meet the markets: Introducing New Zealand

- The 100 largest companies in the world by market capitalization in 2023

- Table 2 Global and regional market shares held by Coca-Cola Co and PepsiCo, 2020

- Maximising the wealth of few at the expense of the health of many: a public health analysis of market power and corporate wealth and income distribution in the global soft drink market

- Public Health Bill

- A new public health bill

- Food and beverage resources launch

- Nutrition policy favours food industry - not public health

- Nutrition policy in whose interests? A New Zealand case study

- How do vested interests maintain outdated policy? The case of food marketing to New Zealand

- National Healthy Food and Drink Policy

- Food Industry Taskforce report

- Artificial sweeteners as a sugar substitute: Are they really safe?

- The impact of a sugar-sweetened beverages tax on oral health and costs of dental care in Australia

- Effect of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation on sugars intake and dental caries: an umbrella review of a global perspective

- Impact of the announcement and implementation of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy on sugar content, price, product size and number of available soft drinks in the UK, 2015-19: A controlled interrupted time series analysis

- Anticipatory changes in British household purchases of soft drinks associated with the announcement of the Soft Drinks Industry Levy: A controlled interrupted time series analysis

- Soft Drinks Industry Levy comes into effect

- NZIER report to Ministry of Health: Sugar taxes

- Changes in prices after an excise tax to sweetened sugar beverages was implemented in Mexico: Evidence from urban areas

- Countries that have taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs)

- Political and public acceptability of a sugar-sweetened beverages tax: A mixed-method systematic review and meta-analysis

- Outcomes following taxation of sugar-sweetened beverages

- WHO: Taxes on sugary drinks - why do it?

- The prospective impact of food pricing on improving dietary consumption: A systematic review and meta-analysis

- Effectiveness of subsidies in promoting healthy food purchases and consumption: a review of field experiments

- Inland Revenue: Exempt supplies

- New Zealand's GST v Exclusions: A case for the exclusion of basic food and menstrual products from Goods and Services Tax in New Zealand

- Tax Working Group 2018

- Ounces of prevention - the public policy case for taxing sugared beverages

- Corporate political activity in the context of unhealthy food advertising restrictions across Transport for London: A qualitative case study.

bottom of page